What is Certificate Pinning?
Certificate pinning is a security mechanism used in the context of authenticating client-server connections, particularly in the context of secure communication over HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure) or other TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. Its primary purpose is to enhance the security of the connection by mitigating the risk of man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks and ensuring that the client only communicates with a trusted server.
How does Certificate Pinning Work?
- Standard Certificate Validation: In a typical TLS handshake, when a client connects to a server, the server presents its digital certificate to the client. The client then checks the certificate’s authenticity by verifying that it has been signed by a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) and that it hasn’t expired or been revoked. If the checks pass, the client proceeds with the secure connection.
- Pinning Trust: Certificate pinning takes the trust verification a step further. Instead of solely relying on the CA system, the client’s application or device has a preconfigured list of public keys or certificates that it explicitly trusts
What are the Disadvantages of Certificate Pinning?
Certificate pinning is not without its challenges. While it can be a tool in preventing certain types of cyberattacks, it comes with its own set of disadvantages. In the next section, we explore the limitations of certificate pinning and discuss alternative approaches that address these drawbacks.
- Maintenance Complexity: Certificate pinning necessitates that clients maintain a list of trusted certificates or public keys. However, this list must be continuously updated to reflect changes in server certificates. As certificates have expiration dates and are regularly renewed, the process of keeping pinned certificates up-to-date can be cumbersome, prone to human error, and may lead to disruptions in service.
- Reduced Flexibility: In dynamic and cloud-based environments where server certificates change frequently (e.g., content delivery networks or microservices), certificate pinning can pose operational challenges. The inflexibility of pinned certificates can hinder smooth transitions during server updates and complicate certificate management.
- Risk of Breaking Connections: Pinning a certificate to an application introduces the risk of connectivity loss if the pinned certificate becomes compromised or expires. This could result in service interruptions for users until the client application is updated with the new pinned certificate.
- Lack of Scalability: Certificate pinning can be impractical for large-scale applications or services that need to communicate with numerous servers, each with its own certificate. Managing a multitude of pinned certificates becomes unwieldy and may undermine the benefits of certificate pinning itself.
Exploring Better Alternatives to Certificate Pinning
Several alternative approaches can bolster the security of client-server connections without the associated challenges:
- Certificate Transparency (CT): Certificate Transparency is a public log of all issued certificates, providing transparency and accountability in the issuance process. By monitoring CT logs, clients can detect unauthorized or fraudulent certificates. This approach doesn’t rely solely on pinning but adds a layer of trust verification, allowing clients to identify rogue certificates without pinning-specific maintenance.
- Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Stapling: OCSP stapling allows servers to provide clients with a digitally signed assertion about the status of their SSL/TLS certificates. By using OCSP stapling, clients can verify the validity of a server’s certificate without relying solely on CA trust. It’s a more dynamic approach that doesn’t require pinning and reduces the risk associated with outdated certificates.
In conclusion, while certificate pinning can enhance the security of client-server connections by reducing the risk of man-in-the-middle attacks, it is not without its drawbacks. The complexity of maintaining and updating pinned certificates, reduced flexibility in dynamic environments, the risk of connection disruptions, and lack of scalability can make it a less practical choice for many applications. Instead, consider exploring alternative approaches like Certificate Transparency (CT) and Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Stapling, which offer robust security measures without the inherent limitations of certificate pinning. By choosing the right security mechanism for your specific use case, you can ensure a safer and more efficient communication between clients and servers.
Get assistance today. Fill out the form below to get in touch with our sales team.